Oregon's aid-and-assist waitlist, from the public record
A federal court order sets a 7-day admission standard for Oregon's aid-and-assist (competency) referrals. This page tracks what OSH's own court-monitor and neutral-expert reports publish — a genuinely volatile record, not a one-way trend.
Built and maintained by Sudhanshu Rai, an
independent researcher; not affiliated with any court, agency, or party. Descriptive measurement
only — no causal claims. Not legal advice — nothing here states your legal rights
or deadlines in any individual case, or reaches a conclusion about any party's compliance,
liability, or wrongdoing; consult a licensed attorney about a specific matter.
Governing order: federal 7-day admission standard for aid-and-assist (competency) referrals, under Disability Rights Oregon v. Mink (originally Mink v. Baldwin), 3:02-cv-00339, D. Or., with subsequent remedial orders. A district-court contempt order allows fines to accrue for continued non-compliance; the fines KPI above reflects amounts accrued under that order, not a one-time penalty.
Get the data
Download the dataset behind this page
Every chart above is a view on this data, not the
other way around.
Percent of that month's admissions within the 7-day standard. Only 3 monthly readings exist in the source reports located so far — too sparse to chart as a trend; shown here as the latest available reading only. This is a sharp reversal, not a consistently low rate: the prior located reading (2024-04) was 90.6%. Source: 2025.09.05-Oregon-Mink-Bowman-Court-Monitor-Report.pdf — page.7 ↗
Each point is OSH's own snapshot count of people on the admission list with a signed
order, 2022-01–2026-03. This series is genuinely volatile —
periods of near-compliance have been followed by real backslides, more than once. Shown exactly as
reported, not smoothed into a cleaner-looking trend line.
Stock (a snapshot headcount) is a different measure from the compliance-percent and
average-wait KPIs above, which are flow metrics for that month's admitted cohort — the two are
reported separately in the source documents and shown separately here, not combined. Readings are
genuinely irregular (not a fixed monthly cadence) — points are spaced by actual elapsed time,
and a dashed segment marks any gap longer than this series' typical interval.
Status
Data quality and reporting limitations
Oregon's compliance-percent and average-wait figures (flow metrics, tied directly to the 7-day standard) are reported far less consistently than Washington's — only a handful of readings have been located in the source reports so far, too sparse to chart as a trend. The waitlist-stock series above is denser and used as the primary chart for that reason, not because it's the more legally relevant number. An open question, not resolved by this data: the court's own neutral expert, Dr. Debra Pinals, has raised a possible "silting" pattern in her 8th and 9th reports — people "silting up in the community restoration system" as fewer are restored in the hospital, a pattern that could mask improvement in the inpatient numbers above. This rebuild has no data of its own confirming or refuting that pattern; it's flagged here as a real, sourced concern the neutral expert raised directly, not as an established fact this project's own data demonstrates.
Get the data
Download the dataset behind this page
Every chart above is a view on this data, not the
other way around.
Competency Restoration Observatory (2026). Oregon aid-and-assist waitlist series [dataset].
competencyrestoration.org · data current through 2026-03 · page generated August 2026
· concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21436450 (always resolves to the latest dataset version — a
version-pinned DOI matching this exact data window follows at the next Zenodo release).
Every figure regenerates from the public source reports by code — fully reproducible.
The Zenodo deposit already includes real, MIT-licensed extraction code for the frozen
Washington/Oregon study (an extraction pipeline plus its own verification gate) — but this
dashboard's own full 5-state codebase (adapted from that study's code, plus Colorado, Texas, and
California from scratch) is a separate, not-yet-public repository. A dedicated "Build &
Replicate" walkthrough page and that public release are both planned but not yet published.
Researchers, clinicians, monitors, and reporters welcome —
especially if you know of more recent source reports for this state. Every correction to an
already-published number is logged on the Changelog page and in
this RSS feed — nothing changes silently.